THURSDAY - AWRP REVISITED (13-NOV-25)

Pair 2 NS - SALLY IRWIN / PETER ISAACS
Place: 1, Percentage: 63.54%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	3: PETER CRANNY / BOB BEELEY	2 N	7C	7	-50	3	30%
Board 2	3: PETER CRANNY / BOB BEELEY	1NT W	3D	5	100	5	50%
Board 3	3: PETER CRANNY / BOB BEELEY	3X S	7S	9	530	10	100%
Board 4	3: PETER CRANNY / BOB BEELEY	2 E	QH	9	-140	0.2	2%
Board 5	2: MARK ELLEVSEN / SHAUGHN FORBES	1 N	TS	9	140	5	50%
Board 6	2: MARK ELLEVSEN / SHAUGHN FORBES	2NT E	4S	8	-120	6	60%
Board 7	2: MARK ELLEVSEN / SHAUGHN FORBES	3NT N	2S	8	-100	5	50%
Board 8	2: MARK ELLEVSEN / SHAUGHN FORBES	3 E	3S	6	150	9.8	98%
Board 13	7: TRISH HOCKING / JEN HOCKING	2 W	TD	10	-170	7	70%
Board 14	7: TRISH HOCKING / JEN HOCKING	3 N	AC	7	-100	8	80%
Board 15	7: TRISH HOCKING / JEN HOCKING	4 S	9D	10	620	4	40%
Board 16	7: TRISH HOCKING / JEN HOCKING	4 E	8C	11	-650	7.4	74%
Board 17	6: BETTY COOPER / ANGELA KNIGHT	3NT N	2D	10	430	8	80%
Board 18	6: BETTY COOPER / ANGELA KNIGHT	3NT S	3D	10	630	10	100%
Board 19	6: BETTY COOPER / ANGELA KNIGHT	1 W	6H	7	-80	8	80%
Board 20	6: BETTY COOPER / ANGELA KNIGHT	4 N	9H	7	-300	3.5	35%
Board 21	5: GUS DE GROOT / MAUREEN DE GROOT	2 S	7H	10	130	6	60%
Board 22	5: GUS DE GROOT / MAUREEN DE GROOT	4 E	QC	9	100	10	100%
Board 23	5: GUS DE GROOT / MAUREEN DE GROOT	3 S	JC	9	140	9	90%
Board 24	5: GUS DE GROOT / MAUREEN DE GROOT	2 S	8H	9	140	5	50%
Board 25	4: JANE PATERSON / KAREN MCSWEENEY	4NT W	4D	9	100	10	100%
Board 26	4: JANE PATERSON / KAREN MCSWEENEY	4 S	9C	7	-300	2	20%
Board 27	4: JANE PATERSON / KAREN MCSWEENEY	3NT S	JH	11	460	8	80%
Board 28	4: JANE PATERSON / KAREN MCSWEENEY	2 W	QC	8	-110	2.6	26%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results